TENNNNHUT! (Attention!) This is a command given by a Parade Commander or a Troop Commander to get his contingent or troops to stand at attention in a military parade or ‘drill’ training. This command normally precedes other commands such as, ‘From the left, Quick March!’, ‘From the left, Forward March!’, ‘Right Turn!’, ‘Left Turn!’, ’Shoulder Arms!’, ‘Present Arms!’, ‘Troop Halt!’ and more.
‘Blighty’, taken from the Hindustani name for “home”, ‘Blighty’ refers to Britain. It is also used to describe a debilitating wound – to “get a Blighty” is to receive a wound serious enough to be posted home.
‘No Man’s Land’ is the area between the trenches of both armies fighting against each other.
‘Brass’ means officers, so ‘Top Brass’ means very senior officers.
Nicknames used by the military are short, clever, or even derogatory substitute names for persons, organisations or even things. Example: Rifle is to 'bondook' or 'Gat' - as Tea is to 'Cha.'
'Bondook' and 'Cha' originate from India when the British Army was based there, whereas 'gat' is a nickname for a gangster's weapon. And you will have, ‘Cha Walla’ (the tea man), and ‘Dhobi Walla’ (the laundryman).
All the nicknames above continue to be used on a daily basis by all British Military personnel today.
As a young man in the 70’s, I served the army as a commissioned officer with the Malaysian Artillery Regiment after completing a tough one-year cadet officer training at the Royal Military College (RMC (MTD)), Kuala Lumpur and we all, commissioned officers, non - commissioned officers (NCOs) and other ranks (ORs) spoke and wrote, either during formal or informal occasions, mainly in English. This made it easier and more convenient for us as at that time, we had to deal and work with the British, American, Australian, New Zealander and Canadian officers, NCOs and ORs when attending courses or training, operations, administration and during rest and recreation (R & R) periods as well. All officers, we were told, are ‘officers and gentlemen’.
The military has an uncanny style and method in cutting short words, phrases and sentences and many were replaced with codes and call signs which fit the description, ‘short and sharp’. These nicknames, codes and call signs are classified as ‘R’ or ‘restricted’ meaning that their use is restricted for use by military personnel only. Eventually however, some of these codes and call signs leaked and got into the mainstream and many people, the civilians, are found using them. Military personnel consider themselves as people and soldiers; all other human beings are termed as ‘civilians’, ‘civvies’ or ‘chogeys’. (‘Chogeys’ are locally employed civilians).
The most common codes I hear now being used by civilians often, especially when texting messages through their cellphones, aren’t that many and they are, ‘roger’, ‘over’, ‘out’, ‘wrong’, ‘correction’, ‘chief’, ‘digger’ (Australian), ‘wildo’, ‘wilco’, etc. However, many civilians use them wrongly, e.g. ‘ok roger’, ‘ok roger bye’, ‘out bye’, ‘wrong correction’, etc. When you use ‘roger’, there’s no need to add ‘ok’ before or after it because ‘ok’ is already implied and understood. One normally answers, ‘roger’ or ‘roger over’, not ‘ok roger over’. The code ‘over’ is normally paired with ‘out’ at the end of a communication when using radios or signal equipment. ‘Roger’ is used to indicate that he understands what the other person is saying. Normally, it is used at the end of a communication and almost always followed by ‘out’. In an oral conversation, when one speaks to the other, e.g. between a superior officer and his subordinate officer face - to – face, in a meeting or a conference, most of the talking are done by the superior officer and it is usually very quick. ‘Yes Sir’ and ‘No Sir’ are almost always the only responses heard from a subordinate officer. Subordinates do not normally question their superiors. Young officers or subalterns are, ‘to be seen and not heard’. When a subordinate officer deals face - to - face with a superior officer, always, at the end of the conversation, he would stand at attention facing his superior and salute him which is a formal military form of respect and say, ‘Thank you, Sir’, and then, ‘Permission to leave, Sir,’ whilst at the same time kicking his heels, salutes (he never smiles because one is not supposed to, to show that he is disciplined, hungry, serious and mean) and then dismiss and quickly marches back to his unit to carry out whatever ‘orders’ he received.
Ladies, regardless whether they are older or younger than the officers (and gentlemen), are always addressed as ’Ma’am’. The ladies, naturally, would feel most delighted with this treatment.
When one uses the code ‘wrong’, he follows with the correction or amendment straightaway. It’s incorrect to say, ‘wrong correction …’ followed by the correction or amendments. Alternatively, one can use the term ‘correction’ followed by the corrections or amendments. ‘Chief’ can be used to mean commander and ‘digger’, normally used by the Australian army, is used when referring to soldiers. ‘Wildo’ (pronounced ‘weel doo’) means ‘will do’ and ‘wilco’ (pronounced ‘weel ko’) means ‘will comply’ with (the instruction or the order given). An officer would say, ‘I say again’ when he wants to repeat something he had said earlier to make sure that his troops had heard him clearly or, ‘Say again’ if he wants to ask a person to repeat what that person says. E.g. ‘Enemy location, ‘I read Delta 37 23.516 - 122 02.625, I say again, enemy location, ………. ’. A typical two-way communication exchange between a Battery Commander (BC) and his Gun Position Officer (GPO) during an operations using standard issue signal equipment would be: ‘Calling Echo 11, this is Sunray, over’. His GPO replies, ‘Echo 11, come in, over,’ (it’s not Echo Eleven, but Echo One One) and so on until the communication ends normally with, ‘Echo 11, wilco, over’ before finally the BC says, ‘Sunray, report every hour on the hour, good luck, over and out,’ in case of a nice BC. They would already have synchronised their watches earlier during the exchange. (Communications between officers and men of the other Corps are quite similar except for the use of their respective ‘call signs’).
In an Artillery unit, either the field or the air defence unit, where they handle the biggest guns and howitzers, they (gunners) are normally attached and put ‘Under Administration’ and sometimes ‘Under Command’, depending on the situation, of an infantry battalion, brigade, division or corp. Regardless of the size of the unit, whether it is a troop, a battery or a regiment, a brigade or even a division or any bigger ‘formation’, they are referred to by their nickname ‘Sheldrake’. Other examples are: ‘Indians’ or ‘Dog Face’ or also known as (aka) ‘foot soldiers’ for the Infantry, ‘Sappers’ for the Engineer Corps, ‘Monkeys’ or ‘Mud Puppy’ for the Military Police, ‘Jimmy’ or ‘Scaleys’ for the Signals Corp, etc. Commanding Officers (COs) of battalions or regiments use the codenames ‘Zulu’ and Battery Commanders (Bty Com) or Company Commanders (Coy Com) use the codenames ‘X-Ray’ and their nicknames is ‘Sunray’, so each unit, regardless of which corps they are from, have their own ‘Zulus’, ‘X – Rays’ and ‘Sunrays’. All ‘Corps’ in the British Army and the British Military including the Air Force and the Navy have the prefix ‘Royal’ before their respective regimental names to indicate that they are units belonging to the Queen’s (Kingdom of Gt. Britain) and had received the HRH Queen’s Royal commission and ‘Royal Colours’, e.g. Royal Air Force, Royal Navy, 1st Royal Infantry Brigade, 52nd Royal Field Artillery Corp, etc. In Malaysia, most units use the title ‘DiRaja’ (after being accorded the ‘Royal Commission and Royal Colours’ by the Yang DiPertuan Agong) placed after the respective units’ names e.g. Regimen Ketiga Artileri DiRaja (3 RAD).
The British Army is the land armed forces branch of Her Majesty's Armed Forces in the United Kingdom. It came into being with the unification of the Kingdoms of England and Scotland into the Kingdom of Great Britain in 1707. The new British Army incorporated Regiments that had already existed in England and Scotland and was administered by the War Office from London. It has been managed by the Ministry of Defence since 1963.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Army
NATO Phonetic Alphabet
NATO’s (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) phonetic alphabet below is used by the armed forces to provide an easy to understand language in the heat of battle. It reduces misinterpretation from background noise, weak radio signals, distorted audio, and radio operator accent. It originated in the 1950s.
A - Alpha
B - Bravo
C - Charlie
D - Delta
E - Echo
F - Foxtrot
G - Golf
H - Hotel
I - India
J - Juliet
K - Kilo
L - Lima
M - Mike
N - November
O - Oscar
P - Papa
Q - Quebec
R - Romeo
S - Sierra
T - Tango
U - Uniform
V - Victor
W - Whisky
X - X-ray
Y - Yankee
Z - Zulu
Military speak or military parlance is the vernacular used within the military and embraces all aspects of service life; it can be described as both a "code" and a "classification" of something. Like many close and closed communities, the language used can often be full of jargon and not readily intelligible to outsiders - sometimes this is for military operational or security reasons; other times it is because of the natural evolution of the day-to-day language used in the various units.
For example: Captain, this situation is 'Scale A' ('Scale A' being an army's parlance for "This situation requires the closest of attention and resources and all members of relevance should be present.")
The military has developed its own slang, partly as means of self-identification. This slang is also used to reinforce the (usually friendly) interservice rivalries. Some terms are derogatory to varying degrees and many service personnel take some pleasure in the sense of shared hardship which they endure and which is reflected in the slang terms.
Here are some websites readers may go to for more information on ‘military speak’. There are of course many more, official and unofficial websites, found on the internet. The British Military always strictly sticks to tradition and custom. All British Army, Navy and Air Force branches and units have their own official websites.
1. http://www.hmforces.co.uk/training/articles/700-military-and-naval-abbreviations-acronyms-and-slang-words
2. http://www.army.mod.uk/signals/signals.aspx
3. http://www.army.mod.uk/structure/structure.aspx
4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Corps_of_Signals
5. http://www.onceamarinealwaysamarine.co.uk/jargon.htm
6. http://web.archive.org/web/20050318122634/http://www.whatalovelywar.co.uk/Vocabulary.html
'TROOPDISSMISSSSSS!
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Restrict use of military ranks
ReplyDeleteAs far as I know, as a former Army officer who earned an Agong's commission, no countries other than Malaysia allow the use of military ranks, for officers and other ranks, other than its use by their military personnel.
A check with some friends, retired and serving military personnel, from Singapore, USA, Australia, New Zealand, UK, India and Pakistan, confirms my view above.
I wonder what it would feel like for someone without the right credentials, qualifications and experience, to wear the rank of a Major General, Lieutenant General or General with two, three or four stars respectively on their shoulders, for example.
Does he know what the implications are and what are the duties and responsibilities of people with two, three or four stars on his shoulders adorning his uniform?
... continued.
Of late, we seem to see many people being conferred with senior military ranks by different people who may not have the authority to do so or ‘who may only assume such authority’ such as ministers and head of departments and this practice seems to be proliferating.
ReplyDeleteRecently, even a president of an association of people who are entertainers, including some clowns among them, was given the honorary rank of Lieutenant Colonel (RELA). The association he leads is not even involved in the business of keeping peace and security of the country. What are the criteria used in granting him an honorary rank?
Has the King’s authority been diminished or taken away?
Do ministers or head of departments have the authority to confer them?
Rightfully, in this country, only the Yang Di Pertuan Agong (King) has the authority to confer commissions to officers of our military personnel that is after they have completed an approved scheduled theory and practical training for at least one year.
We have our own Royal Military College to train qualified candidates, men and women, to become military officers. Upon successful completion of their officer cadet training, they are commissioned by the King as 2nd Lieutenants and they are then sent to various units to serve.
There are others, after completing basic training locally who are sent to officer cadet schools either in USA, Australia, New Zealand, UK, India or Pakistan. These officers will receive their commissions from the heads of state of the respective countries of the military colleges they go to.
All officers of the Malaysian Armed Forces take the oath of allegiance and loyalty to the King and country which states more or less as follows, “I solemnly swear that I will support and defend the country and the Constitution of Malaysia, the King and country, against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter."
The oath of allegiance is accompanied with a full length photo and fingerprints of all ten fingers of the officer and not just the thumbprint like what is done in other oath or agreement documents.
As the officer progresses in his career, he will have to undergo further training, attend courses and sit for and pass scheduled examinations at various stages of his career before he gets promoted to Lieutenant, Captain, Major and so on and he is given added responsibilities to shoulder until he gets to be a four star general. The higher the rank, the fewer are the holders. In the Malaysian Armed Forces, the rank of four-star general is accorded to only four officers, viz. the Panglima Angkatan Tentera (Chief of the Armed Forces), Panglima Tentera Darat (Chief of the Army), Panglima Tentera Laut (Chief of the Navy) and Panglima Tentera Udara (Chief of the Air Force).
Every ranking and non-ranking personnel (private) in the military know exactly what their specific roles, duties and responsibilities are and they are well trained and equipped to carry out their respective roles properly. Every one of them knows where they stand in the line of command. He or she may be in a section, platoon, company or a battalion or even in larger organisations such as a brigade, division or in an Army Corp or an Army Group and so on.
The Malaysian Volunteers Corps Act 2012 (Rela Act) which came into operation on 22nd June 2012. As members of the Volunteers Corps, RELA members are not military officers but in the schedule (Section 22) of the Rela Act, officers of RELA are accorded ranks exactly like the military with the ranks of Majors up to General considered as officers and from the ranks or privates up to Captains, they are known as members. The insignia and rank designs, including the number of stars used, are almost exactly like the ones used by the Malaysian Army.
..continued.
RELA personnel, officers and members, wear uniforms that has a military-like look complete with berets and they are now commonly seen everywhere; to take care of traffic at weddings, at shopping complexes, markets, schools, for example. Their presence may give a wrong impression to foreigners and tourists who may think that military personnel are being deployed everywhere and questions may rise about our security situation. Worse still, if foreign journalists write about wrong assumptions they perceive after seeing the indiscretion of RELA officers everywhere in this country.
ReplyDeleteWe, former and existing members of the Malaysian Armed Forces, are unclear about the rationale in the use of military ranks by RELA and we wonder if the people who approve the Act have the authority to do so. I also do not think that the formation of RELA and the drawing up of the Act were ever discussed with MINDEF at all.
The Act makes light, if not fun, of military ranks.
RELA officers and members may use insignias to indicate the respective and different positions or appointment but they must never use insignias and ranks similar to the ones use by the military.
Military insignias and ranks are only for military use and it must be treated like a trademark or a copyright of the Malaysian Armed Forces. They also must not wear uniforms that are similar or exactly the same as military personnel. This has to be observed, respected and honored by all.
Military uniforms, insignias and ranks must be restricted in their use to military officers only.
Of course, officers providing essential services such as the Sea Ports and Malayan Railways, for example, who during an emergency or a war, may be mobilised as military personnel, are allowed to use uniforms, military ranks and insignias similar to the ones used by the Malaysian Army and that is provided by law on certain official occasions.
In a wedding ceremony of a major local male celebrity not too long ago, the groom even had the gall to put two stars on his shoulders similar to the stars use by an officer with the rank of Major General in the Army on the military ceremonial dress he wore at his wedding and he even had the gall to have people who look like police officers as sword bearers at his wedding do.
Only genuine military and police officers are entitled to the services of sword-bearers to parade or perform at their weddings and no one else.
All the above questionable acts has made a total mockery of military ranks and military uniforms and the novelty of being officers of all ranks is now lost. No one seems to be in control of the situation and the government, including the Prime Minister, seems to be silent about it. In addition to that, not even the Defence Minister and none of the senior serving military officers have said anything about the situation.
If similar actions happen in the countries I mentioned above, there will surely be a big hue and cry about it. People there respect and honour dearly people in the military and their rights and no one makes fun of them. They are proud of their soldiers, officers and other ranks (veterans), who have fought in the various wars in the past either in defending their country or their sovereignty.
If the use of military uniforms, insignias and ranks are not controlled or restricted in this country, we will soon have military style organisations complete with military uniforms and ranks and perhaps equipped with weapons and, they may or they can create unnecessary and unwanted problems that may undermine the country’s peace, security and prosperity.
We, the retired and serving members of the Malaysian Armed Forces, hope that the Prime Minister, the Defence Minister, the Home Minister and the government will take a serious look at this matter and correct the situation as soon as possible.
Captain Hussaini Abdul Karim, RAD (Rtd.)
Restrict use of military ranks - The Sun Daily
ReplyDeletePosted on 27 January 2013
AS FAR as I know, as a former army officer who earned an Agong's commission, no countries other than Malaysia allow the use of military ranks, other than its use by their military personnel.
A check with some friends (both retired and serving military personnel) from Singapore, the US, Australia, New Zealand, UK, India and Pakistan, confirms my view.
I wonder what it would feel like for someone without the right credentials, qualifications and experience, to wear the rank of a major general, lieutenant general or general. Does he know what the implications are and what are the duties and responsibilities of people with such ranks?
Of late, we see people being conferred with senior military ranks by individuals who may not have the authority to do so or "who may only assume such authority".
Even a president of an association involved in the entertainment industry was given the honorary rank of lieutenant colonel (Rela). What were the criteria used in granting him that honorary rank?
Has the king's authority been diminished or taken away?
Only the Yang di-Pertuan Agong has the authority to confer commissions to military officers.
We have the Royal Military College to train qualified candidates to become military officers. Upon successful completion of their cadet training, they are commissioned by the king as second lieutenants and they are then posted to various units. There are others, who after completing basic training are sent to officer cadet schools in the US, Australia, New Zealand, UK, India and Pakistan.
All officers of the Malaysian armed forces take an oath of allegiance and loyalty to the king and country.
As the officer progresses in his career, he will have to undergo further training, attend courses and sit for scheduled examinations before he gets promoted to the rank of lieutenant, captain, major and so on. In the armed forces, the rank of a four-star general is accorded to only four officers, namely the armed forces chief, army chief, navy chief and air force chief.
The Malaysian Volunteers Corps Act 2012 (Rela Act) came into operation on June 22, 2012. As members of the Volunteers Corps, Rela members are not military officers but in the schedule (Section 22) of the Act – officers of Rela are accorded ranks exactly like the military such as private, captain, major and general. The insignia and rank designs, including the number of stars used, are almost exactly like the ones used by the army.
Rela personnel, officers and members wear uniforms that have a military-like look, complete with berets. Their presence may give the wrong impression to foreigners and tourists who may think that military personnel are being deployed everywhere.
We, former and existing members of the Malaysian armed forces, are unclear about the rationale in the use of military ranks by Rela. I also do not think that the formation of Rela and the drawing up of the Act were discussed with the Defence Ministry.
Rela officers and members may use insignias to indicate positions or appointments but they must never use insignias and ranks similar to the ones used by the military.
If the use of military uniforms, insignias and ranks are not controlled or restricted, we will soon have military-style organisations complete with military uniforms and ranks – and perhaps staff equipped with weapons too. This will create unnecessary and unwanted problems that may undermine peace, security and prosperity.
Capt Hussaini Abdul Karim (Rtd)
Shah Alam